RESUMO
Background: MAC was defined as a dense, localized, highly reflective area at the base of the posterior mitral leaflet detected by TTE. Obstructive CAD was defined as either 50% reduction of the internal diameter of the left main coronary artery or 70% reduction of the internal diameter of the left anterior descending, right coronary, or left circumflex artery distribution. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of echocardiographically detected MAC as a predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD).Material & Methods:In this prospective, observational, case-control study, coronary angiography was done in 50 patients with MAC and equal number of patients without MAC, detected with transthoracic echocardiography. Analysis was done to observe the association and correlation of MAC with angiographic findings.Results:Mean age of the case control was 55.16 � 10.73 years and control was 49.80 � 8.84 years. In this study 34% of patients with MAC and 32% patients without MAC had single vessel disease, 16% of patients with MAC and 24% patients without MAC had double vessel disease, 42% of patients with MAC and 22% patients without MAC had triple vessel disease (TVD), 16% of patients with MAC and 4% patients without MAC had Left main coronary artery disease and 8% of patients with MAC and 22% patients without MAC had no significant CAD.Multivariate analysis shows MAC (p=0.049) as an independent predictor for coronary artery disease (CAD).Conclusions:Transthoracic echocardiographically detected MAC is an independent predictor of coronary artery disease. The low cost, portable and radiation free nature of the ultrasound approach make MAC an attractive parameter in the ongoing search for the ideal marker of coronary artery disease (CAD).
RESUMO
Background: Operator dependent two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography is a noninvasive test to assess myocardial hypokinesia. Inter observer variability is more as it is subjective. Objective evidence of 2D global longitudinal strain (2D GLS) and strain rate imaging are getting popularity. Methods: This cross sectional study was done on 20 patients who came for dobutamine stress echo (DSE) in the department of cardiology of BSMMU, Dhaka from 1st February 2019 to 31st July 2019. 2D GLS was done before and just after DSE. Results: DSE findings revealed 6 patients had viable LAD, 9 had viable LCX and 6 had viable RCA, 9 had nonviable LAD, 2 had nonviable LCX and 3 had nonviable RCA territories. Difference in Post-systolic strain rate (SRps) in myocardial segments supplied by LAD at baseline peak stress in patients who had normal and nonviable LAD (-21% to. -23%, p=0.98) and (-6%to – 7%, p= 2.87) which were not significant. At peak exercise there was a trend towards greater SRps in viable territory of LAD in compared with baseline and peak stress (-1% to -16%, P = 0.05) which was significant. SRps in myocardial segments supplied by LCX at baseline and peak stress in patients who have normal and nonviable LCX (-20% to. -21%, p=0.82) and (-5%to – 5%, p=1.18) which had similar result as LAD territory. At peak exercise there was a trend towards greater SRps in viable territory of LCX compared with baseline and peak stress (-12% to -15%, P = 0.06). There was no significant difference in SRps in myocardial segments supplied by RCA at baseline and peak stress in patients who had normal and nonviable RCA (-23% to. -24%, p=1.72) and (-4%to – 5%, p=2.10). At peak exercise there was a trend towards greater SRps in viable territory of RCA compared with baseline and peak stress (-10% to -15%, P = 0.04). Conclusion: Results of subjective interpretation of DES has compared with objective evidence 2D GLS on peak stress which has similarity. It was a small study. Future large study is needed to establish these findings.
RESUMO
Background: The subvalvular apparatus arrangementcan causeventricular torsion& deformation during cardiac cycle and interruption of papillary annular complex. As a result there was impairment of normal left ventricular strain pattern.[2] In patients with mitral stenosis, the left ventricle is small. Preservation of subvalvular apparatus thus become important in moderation of left ventricular volume in long term in patients with mitral stenosis undergoing mitral valve replacement.Methods: This cross sectional study was performed on the 32 consecutive subjects in department of cardiac surgery and cardiology of BSMMU with rheumatic mitral stenosis undergoing MVR from Jan 2013 to June 2014.Mode of surgery was determined by morphology of subvalvular apparatus which dictated the extent of the preservation. The patients were divided into two groups- Group I- With preservation of subvalvular apparatus &Group II- No preservation- where SVA was completely excised. In 2D and M Mode echocardiographic measurements:Mid-wall circumferential end systolic LV stress as calculated for ellipsoid, LV mass, the mid wall circumferential end systolic LV stress is calculated by mirsky’s formula.9,10 Results: Patients with sub valvular apparatus resection (group I) had deterioration with postoperative ejectionfraction in compare to group-II. Left ventricular circumferential wall stress analysis showed increased wall stress in group II after MVR. Conclusion: The increased left ventricular wall stress is responsible for poor outcome in non-preserved group after MVR. The wall stress increases further in midterm follow up which may explain the mechanism of long term poor out come in patients with mitral stenosis.
RESUMO
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) had shown great promise in improving hospitalization and mortality of the patients suffering from refractory heart failure (HF) inspite of optimal medical management. The goal of CRT is to reduce cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony, thereby enabling the heart to contract more efficiently. Mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony as estimated by electrical dyssynchrony, is assessed with the QRS duration. But electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony are not well correlated in all HF patients. The dyssynchrony might have been related to the underlying etiology of HF. Objective: To compare the concordance of mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients. Methods: Doppler echocardiography and strain echocardiography was performed in 76 patients presenting with heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=40) or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n=36) with left ventricular ejection fraction<35% & New York Heart Association class III–IV, regardless of their QRS duration. Interventricular dyssynchrony was assessed by the time interval between preaortic and prepulmonary ejection times. Intra-ventricular dyssynchrony was assessed by using conventional Doppler and strain echocardiograpy. Obtained from the three standard apical view (TMinMax) and (2) the standard deviation of the averaged time-to-peak strain (TPS-SD, ms) and (3) time to peak myocardial systolic velocity (Ts-SD) of same segments. Result: The correlation coefficient between QRS duration and mechanical interventricular dyssynchrony was significant (r=0.57, P=0.001) in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and insignificant (r=0.175, p=0.281) in patients with ischemic cardiomyoparhy. The correlation coefficient between QRS duration and mechanical intraventricular dyssynchrony was significant in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (r= 0.69, P = 0.001 for TMin Max; r=0.57, P= 0.001 for TPS-SD; r=0.48, p=0.003 for TS-SD) and insignificant in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (r=0.153; p=0.345 for TMin Max; r=0.178; p=0.273 for TPS-SD r=0.139; p=0.392 for TS-SD). Conclusion: This study showed that the relationship between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony is dependent on the underlying etiology of heart failure.
RESUMO
Background: Regression of ventricular hypertrophy is the restoration of normal ventricular structure and physiology after the hypertrophy has developed. It has been clearly demonstrated that once left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is diagnosed, it represents a strong blood pressure independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different anti-hypertensive agents in reducing LVH in Bangladeshi population. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out to detect the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive Bangladeshi population using high resolution M-mode echocardiographic study in 110 patients with clinically diagnosed hypertension were included in this study but later 15 patients failed to attend clinic for subsequent follow up. Hence, total number of patient was 95; The mean age (±SD) of these patients were 42 ± 5 and male-female ratio was 8.5:1.5. Out of these 95 patients, 20 were included in Beta-blocker(BB) group, 14 in Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor(ACEi) group, 20 in Beta-blocker(BB) + Diuretic(DD), 14 were recruited in Angiotensin enzyme inhibitor(ACEi) + Diuretics(DD) and 13 in Beta-blocker and ACEi group and 14 in BB + ACEI + Diuretic group. We followed these patients after 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years in our clinic. A baseline M-mode echocardiography was done to document LVH. During this follow up, we have measured IVSd, PWd, LVIDd and LVIDs and statistically analyzed SD and P-value for each group by using SPSS software. The duration of study was from 01.07.2005 to 30.06.2008. Results: Comparison of Beta blocker alone and ACEi alone group for LVH regression showed a P value of 0.59. Although this figure did not show a statistically significant value if we increase number of patients in both group we would expect a statistically significant P value in favour of ACEi. BB plus diuretics was compared with ACEi plus Diuretics which showed P value of 0.85. We also compared BB plus ACEi group with BB plus ACEi plus DD for LVH regression which showed a P value of 0.79. Conclusion: Among three groups of anti-hypertensive drugs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor(ACEi) alone has been found to be most effective as compared to Beta blockers when used alone than in combination groups with (Beta blocker plus ACEi plus Diuretics or Beta blocker plus ACEi). Although, these figure was not found statistically significant a clear benefit has been shown in all groups in terms of LVH regression and essentially if the power or size if this is increased a statistically significant value of LVH regression value may be observed in all these groups.